GAAR.com » News » FHA Announces Policy Changes

FHA Announces Policy Changes

Posted on Jan 20th, 2010

Image for FHA Announces Policy Changes Federal Housing Administration (FHA) Commissioner David Stevens announced a set of policy changes to strengthen the FHA’s capital reserves, while enabling the agency to continue to fulfill its mission to provide access to homeownership for underserved communities. The changes announced today are the latest in a series of changes Stevens has enacted in order to better position the FHA to manage its risk while continuing to support the nation’s housing market recovery.
The FHA will propose to take the following steps: increase the mortgage insurance premium (MIP); update the combination of FICO scores and down payments for new borrowers; reduce seller concessions to three percent, from six percent; and implement a series of significant measures aimed at increasing lender enforcement. U.S. Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan previewed the changes in December of last year, noting that the FHA would announce additional details before the end of January.
“Striking the right balance between managing the FHA’s risk, continuing to provide access to underserved communities, and supporting the nation’s economic recovery is critically important,” said Commissioner Stevens. “When combined with the risk management measures announced in September of last year, these changes are among the most significant steps to address risk in the agency’s history. Additionally, by continuing to provide affordable, responsible mortgage products, FHA will support the housing market’s recovery. Importantly, FHA will remain the largest source of home purchase financing for underserved communities.”
Announced FHA Policy Changes:
1.Mortgage insurance premium (MIP) will be increased to build up capital reserves and bring back private lending
◦The first step will be to raise the up-front MIP by 50 bps to 2.25% and request legislative authority to increase the maximum annual MIP that the FHA can charge.
◦If this authority is granted, then the second step will be to shift some of the premium increase from the up-front MIP to the annual MIP.
◦This shift will allow for the capital reserves to increase with less impact to the consumer, because the annual MIP is paid over the life of the loan instead of at the time of closing
◦The initial up-front increase is included in a Mortgagee Letter to be released tomorrow, January 21st, and will go into effect in the spring.


2.Update the combination of FICO scores and down payments for new borrowers.
◦New borrowers will now be required to have a minimum FICO score of 580 to qualify for FHA's 3.5% down payment program. New borrowers with less than a 580 FICO score will be required to put down at least 10%.
◦This allows the FHA to better balance its risk and continue to provide access for those borrowers who have historically performed well.
◦This change will be posted in the Federal Register in February and, after a notice and comment period, would go into effect in the early summer.


3.Reduce allowable seller concessions from 6% to 3%
◦The current level exposes the FHA to excess risk by creating incentives to inflate appraised value. This change will bring FHA into conformity with industry standards on seller concessions.
◦This change will be posted in the Federal Register in February, and after a notice and comment period, would go into effect in the early summer.


4.Increase enforcement on FHA lenders
◦Publicly report lender performance rankings to complement currently available Neighborhood Watch data - Will be available on the HUD website on February 1.
■This is an operational change to make information more user-friendly and hold lenders more accountable; it does not require new regulatory action as Neighborhood Watch data is currently publicly available.
◦Enhance monitoring of lender performance and compliance with FHA guidelines and standards.
■Implement Credit Watch termination through lender underwriting ID in addition to originating ID.
■This change is included in a Mortgagee Letter to be released tomorrow, January 21st, and is effective immediately.
◦Implement statutory authority through regulation of section 256 of the National Housing Act to enforce indemnification provisions for lenders using delegated insuring process
■Specifications of this change will be posted in March, and after a notice and comment period, would go into effect in early summer.
◦HUD is pursuing legislative authority to increase enforcement on FHA lenders. Specific authority includes:
■Amendment of section 256 of the National Housing Act to apply indemnification provisions to all Direct Endorsement lenders. This would require all approved mortgagees to assume liability for all of the loans that they originate and underwrite
■Legislative authority permitting HUD maximum flexibility to establish separate "areas" for purposes of review and termination under the Credit Watch initiative. This would provide authority to withdraw originating and underwriting approval for a lender nationwide on the basis of the performance of its regional branches
In addition to the changes proposed today, the FHA is continuing to review its overall response to housing market conditions, and continuing to evaluate its mortgage insurance underwriting standards and its measures to help distressed and underwater borrowers through FHA/HAMP and other FHA initiatives going forward.

Source

Print Comment


Comments (1)


Sean C. Remington, ABR wrote:
The quote "A tough balance" is right on the money! Revisions such as the higher-priced MIP, 580 credit score for 3.5% assistance, etc. definitely prevent against mortgage disasters. At what point do we make it too difficult to get a loan though keeping buyers out of the market that could help the overall economy? I don't know the answer, but I agree with the decisions FHA is making. However, I would like to see underwriters have a bit more discretion to personally approve or decline special circumstances that arise. For example, I recently had a client who the underwriter stated needed a common law divorce decree from California. After contacting an attorney in California who specializes in this, I learned that he cannot provide one because it did not apply to my client / he did not meet the criteria for it. The underwriter would not back down on requiring it. Now how can my borrower possibly provide something to the underwriter that cannot possibly exist (for those that are curious we ended up going to a local bank and getting a portfolio loan that didn't require such silliness)? Case by case. Fortunately FHA recognizes that this is a fluid process that will require tweaks and revisions as time moves forward.

on Jan 21, 2010 at 1:30 pm

Leave a Comment


You must be a REALTOR® member to post comments. Login

External Resources